|Question||a) What did the jury think about Hernandez’s claim?
b) Then why did the trial judge conclude that Hernandez was entitled to nothing?
c) Why does a trial judge have the power to ignore a jury’s decision?
d) Did the jury’s verdict in this case fail to rest on the evidence?
e) What is that standard?
f) Isn’t this appeals court substituting its own judgment for that of the trial judge?